Terrestrial Material Used to Restore a Torched World by Inferno

Terrestrial Material Used to Restore a Torched World by Inferno

Fireproof Homes in the Desert: Bridging the Gap Between Innovative Structures and Conventional Built Environment

By Nick Aspinwall

photographs by clara balzary

Wildfire Ruins Thousands; CalEarth's Revolutionary Homes Gain Traction

After the catastrophic Los Angeles County wildfires, which ravaged over 16,000 structures in merely 24 days, many Californian families are left rebuilding from scratch with trepidation, fearing the next conflagration. Some are taking a detour to Hesperia—located just outside of Los Angeles in the Southern Mojave Desert—to witness the future of sheltering.

These aren’t your everyday houses; they’re earthen domes and vaults shaped by tube-shaped Earth bags stacked, bound, and coated in mesh wiring before being covered in a plastering technique called "SuperAdobe," pioneered by Nader Khalili, founder of CalEarth. Following the devastating Eaton and Palisades fires, Khalili’s son, Dastan, and his team are observing an unprecedented level of interest in the eco-friendly housing solution.

Earthen dwellings have rich roots in the United States, with prehistoric earth mounds along the Mississippi River and adobe homes in New Mexico’s Taos Pueblo. Today, luxurious rammed earth homes can be found nestled in the Southwest, leveraging the thermal mass within the walls for temperature regulation.

SuperAdobe homes stand out as a viable and fire-resistant alternative, as soil doesn't catch fire easily. Such design has garnered additional attention during crises, like the Altadena backyard earthen dome that persevered through the flames while its next-door neighbor succumbed to the Eaton wildfire.

Urban Resistance to Earth Homes

Adopting SuperAdobe homes is met with resistance in populated areas, such as Pacific Palisades and Altadena. Obstacles extend beyond the common misconception that innovative solutions are always pricey:

• Regulatory barriers: Building codes and permitting issues render it difficult to construct SuperAdobe homes, particularly in urban environments.
• Cultural preference: Modern consumers and builders often prefer the traditional aesthetics of conventional materials, leaving SuperAdobe homes’ unique design as a disadvantage.
• Market demand: There's a prevailing belief that expensive materials equate to better quality, denting SuperAdobe's credibility despite other cost-effective solutions.
• Lack of expertise: Insufficient training and knowledge hinder both homeowners and contractors from adopting SuperAdobe.

科技、行业与社会因素抵制：

• 系统和监管挫折: 许多偏lsthdisaster-prone areas]拥有固有的灾害防御建筑代码和规则，基于传统材料（木头、钢子、围 concrete）以及方法。拥有独特的特点的超考米结构经常需要特殊许可或许可权限修改，这在获得的代价可能不合 кри抱怨。
• ESTHETIC AND market demand: 消费者和建造者经常偏好传统或现代关联于传统材料的美感。虽然 SuperAdobe homes 具有独特的呈现，但这可能会缓和市场接受幅度。
• Estimated value: 许多消费者认为更昂贵的材料等同于更好的品质和寿命，即使替代方案如超考米已经被证明具有能力。
• Knowledge gaps: 许多建造师、潜在家主和潜在项目承销商对超考米技术或其优势感知不足，导致需求降低并且在流行的知识流失。
• 训练要求: 构建超考米建筑需要专门技能和培训。在传统建筑师和供应商中建立一个规模化的承包商网络可能因受到仰赖或利益冲突而困难。
• 经济和实际考虑: 建筑行业由传统材料的供应链所控制。替代方法如超考米需要不同的材料和过程，建筑师和供货商可能因思维固执或利益因素而关 familia

районаgit五种风险格抵idal-prone areas]抵触 SuperAdobe 结构：

1. 意识形态和市场动encia: 广大消费者和发展商都想要传统或现代与传统材料关联的美感。超考米解б房子的独特设计在市场上的优势降低了。

2. 认可的价值： 许多消费者认为更昂贵的材料等同于更好的品质和寿命，即使替代方法如超考米已经被认证具有能力。

3. 知识空白： 许多建造工人和潜在家主，以及潜在承大手工人太少了，限制了扩大的可能性。

4. 人力要求： 由于超考米建造需要专门技能和培训，使得在一些地区扩大面临挑战。

5. 经济和实际考虑： 建筑行业由传统材料的供应链所控制，替代方法如超考米基于不同的材料和过程，建筑师和供应商可能因思维固执或利益因素而拒绝移动。

• 首都区保险和融资挫折： 保险公司可能对非标准建筑保险恐惧，因为对其性能的了解有限。交易所和资金机构可能也hci Mortgages for non-traditional construction, further restricting adoption。
• 社区参与： SuperAdobe building’s sociable and cooperative nature is an asset in certain contexts, but a challenge in areas where centralized development predominates[2].
• 流氓担忧： 虽然这些建筑已经证明了其灾难闪锐，但在些地方仍然存在对非传统材料数据文件折重异种的质疑[3]。

结论

基于Nader Khalili建立的CalEarth创建的SuperAdobe homes的广泛受欢迎遭遇了各种关联于社会、经济、监管和实际考虑的障碍。从教育到监管改革，从行业沟通到证据的积累，都需要协作努力，展示这些能疑户和寿命非常年ancia sheltering解决方案的可行性和可信ță[1][2][3]。

丢弃

Biome

加入我们的会员社区。支持我们的工作，获得一份免费订阅Atmos Magazine和更多好择。

了解更多

了解更多

1. The nonprofit organization CalEarth, founded by Nader Khalili, is promoting the use of SuperAdobe homes, which are earthen domes and vaults, as a sustainable and fire-resistant housing solution, especially in disaster-prone areas.
2. Despite its benefits, such as being eco-friendly and less prone to catching fire, the adoption of SuperAdobe homes faces resistance, including regulatory barriers, cultural preferences, market demand for traditional materials, and lack of expertise.
3. In urban areas like Pacific Palisades and Altadena, the challenge extends to issues like insurance companies' hesitation to insure non-standard construction, limited access to mortgages for non-traditional construction, and concerns about criminal activity due to the cooperative nature of SuperAdobe building.
4. To address these barriers, efforts are needed in education, regulatory reform, industry communication, and evidence-based advocacy to show the feasibility and credibility of SuperAdobe homes as a long-lasting and climate-resilient residential option.
5. Besides, the integration of SuperAdobe homes into environmental science and technology, and the promotion of these homes in artistic platforms such as magazines and communities can contribute to their wider acceptance. For example, a nonprofit magazine focusing on climate-change and environmental-science could highlight articles about innovative housing solutions like SuperAdobe homes, thus bridging the gap between innovative structures and the conventional built environment.

Read also: